Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] x86/tlb: add tlb_flushall_factor into sysfs foruser testing/tuning

[Greg KH]

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:00:13PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> kernel will replace cr3 rewrite with invlpg when
>   tlb_flush_entries <= active_tlb_entries / 2^tlb_flushall_factor
> if tlb_flushall_factor is -1, kernel won't do this replacement.
> 
> User can modify its value according to specific applications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu |   12 ++++++
>  arch/x86/Kconfig.debug                             |   11 ++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                       |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/base/cpu.c                                 |    4 ++
>  include/linux/cpu.h                                |    4 ++
>  5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> index e7be75b..05f8eb7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> @@ -78,6 +78,18 @@ Description:	Dynamic addition and removal of CPU's.  This is not hotplug
>  		the system.  Information writtento the file to remove CPU's
>  		is architecture specific.
>  
> +What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/tlb_flushall_factor
> +Date:		May 2012
> +Contact:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +Description:	tlb_flushall_factor show and setting interface
> +		tlb_flushall_factor shows the balance point in replacing cr3
> +		writting with multiple 'invlpg'. It will do this replacement
> +		when flush_tlb_lines <= active_lines/2^tlb_flushall_factor
> +		If tlb_flushall_factor is -1, means the replacement will be
> +		disabled.
> +
> +		User can set this for the specific CPU or application.

Nowhere do you say this is x86 only, please fix that.

> +
>  What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/node
>  Date:		October 2009
>  Contact:	Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> index e46c214..5b87493 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -129,6 +129,17 @@ config DOUBLEFAULT
>  	  option saves about 4k and might cause you much additional grey
>  	  hair.
>  
> +config DEBUG_TLBFLUSH
> +	bool "Enable user level tlb flush all setting"
> +	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && (X86_64 || X86_INVLPG)
> +	---help---
> +	  This option allows user tune tlb_flushall_factor knob that under
> +	  /sys/devices/system/cpu, set to -1 means do tlb flush all for any
> +	  multiple tlb lines evacuation demand. Otherwise kernel will use
> +	  multiple 'invlpg' for the demand when
> +	      flush_lines <= active_tlb_lines / 2^tlb_flushall_factor
> +	  If in doubt, say "N"

Yeah, another tunable that no one knows how to use.

Really, why is this here at all?  As others pointed out, this really
looks like a debugging thing that almost no one will ever need, so
please, put it in debugfs.

> +
>  config IOMMU_DEBUG
>  	bool "Enable IOMMU debugging"
>  	depends on GART_IOMMU && DEBUG_KERNEL
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 8879d20..d1986c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -481,6 +481,43 @@ void __cpuinit cpu_detect_tlb(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		tlb_flushall_factor);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_TLBFLUSH
> +static ssize_t __tlb_flushall_factor_store(const char *buf,
> +					size_t count, int smt)
> +{
> +	short factor = 0;
> +
> +	if (sscanf(buf, "%hd", &factor) != 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	tlb_flushall_factor = factor;
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t tlb_flushall_factor_show(struct device *dev,
> +					   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					   char *buf)
> +{
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%hd\n", tlb_flushall_factor);
> +}
> +static ssize_t tlb_flushall_factor_store(struct device *dev,
> +					    struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					    const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	return __tlb_flushall_factor_store(buf, count, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(tlb_flushall_factor, 0644,
> +		   tlb_flushall_factor_show,
> +		   tlb_flushall_factor_store);
> +
> +int __init create_sysfs_tlb_flushall_factor(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_tlb_flushall_factor);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  void __cpuinit detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index adf937b..dc0f77b 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,10 @@ void __init cpu_dev_init(void)
>  
>  	cpu_dev_register_generic();
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_TLBFLUSH
> +	create_sysfs_tlb_flushall_factor(cpu_subsys.dev_root);
> +#endif

Do the #ifdef in the .h file, not the .c file please, no matter how you
end up doing this (debugfs vs. sysfs.)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/