Re: [PATCH 00/10] jump label: introduce very_[un]likely + cleanups+ docs

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 15:56 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Again, maybe we need a "very_unlikely()" for the tracing case,
> 
> ... and that's the usecase for the scheduler, for events and for 
> networking. I.e. all current usecases in the kernel 

The scheduler also really wants the very_likely() variant. We have less
use for the unbiased one though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/