Re: [PATCH 10/20] pinctrl: Assume map table entries can't have a NULLctrl_dev_name field

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Tue Feb 21 2012 - 08:36:51 EST

Next message: Mark Wielaard: "[PATCH] x86-64: Fix CFI data for common_interrupt"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "[PATCH] pinctrl: spawn U300 pinctrl from the COH901 GPIO"
In reply to: Stephen Warren: "[PATCH 10/20] pinctrl: Assume map table entries can't have a NULL ctrl_dev_name field"
Next in thread: Dong Aisheng: "Re: [PATCH 10/20] pinctrl: Assume map table entries can't have aNULL ctrl_dev_name field"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> These are already disallowed. Clean up some code that doesn't assume this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied!

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Wielaard: "[PATCH] x86-64: Fix CFI data for common_interrupt"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "[PATCH] pinctrl: spawn U300 pinctrl from the COH901 GPIO"
In reply to: Stephen Warren: "[PATCH 10/20] pinctrl: Assume map table entries can't have a NULL ctrl_dev_name field"
Next in thread: Dong Aisheng: "Re: [PATCH 10/20] pinctrl: Assume map table entries can't have aNULL ctrl_dev_name field"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]