Re: [PATCH RT 2/2 v4] preempt-rt/x86: Delay calling signals in int3

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 02/06, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 20:31 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Damn. Sorry for noise...
> >
> > On 02/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > +int force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
> > > +	if (in_atomic()) {
> > > +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(t != current))
> >
> > This is certainly wrong in upstream kernel. It does use force_
> > this way although it shouldn't imho.
>
> It's wrong in upstream even with the #ifdef define here?

No, the patch has no effect if !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/