Re: [RFC] splitting cgroup.c

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Jan 19 2012 - 07:30:26 EST


Hello, Li.

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I agree that splitting is necessary but IMHO splitting usually tends
>> to go too far.  Maybe we can split it into two and think about further
>> splitting later on?  e.g. internal logic vs. userland interfacing.
>
> This isn't feasible. The feasible way is to split by functionality,
> which I think was the way taken by perf developers.

Eh? Feasible or desirable? How can it be not feasible? Why?

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/