Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree

[Ming Lei]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2011/9/28 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
>> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, Ming Lei wrote:
>> >> Hi Stephen and Rafael,
>> >>
>> >> Sorry, the attachment patch can fix the build failure, which is
>> >> caused by unset CONFIG_RUNTIME_PM.
>> >
>> > First off, that's CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.  Second, why do you want to build
>> > rpm-traces.c at all if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is unset?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, you are right,  follows the correct fix:
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Makefile b/kernel/trace/Makefile
>> index 56bdab5..f49405f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/Makefile
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/Makefile
>> @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ endif
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING) += trace_events_filter.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT) += trace_kprobe.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) += power-traces.o
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME),y)
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) += rpm-traces.o
>> +endif
>>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_TRACING),y)
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB_KDB) += trace_kdb.o
>>  endif
>
> Well, this still is kind of ugly.  I'd prefer my patch sent in this thread.

Both are doable, :-)

But I don't think it is ugly, and this way is taken by BLOCK/PERF_EVENTS/
KGDB_KDB in kernel/trace/Makefile. Also this one is a simple fix and
don't introduce any new config option, which is unnecessary.


thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/