Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2011/9/28 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> > On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> Hi Stephen and Rafael,
> >>
> >> Sorry, the attachment patch can fix the build failure, which is
> >> caused by unset CONFIG_RUNTIME_PM.
> >
> > First off, that's CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.  Second, why do you want to build
> > rpm-traces.c at all if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is unset?
> >
> 
> Yes, you are right,  follows the correct fix:
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/Makefile b/kernel/trace/Makefile
> index 56bdab5..f49405f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/trace/Makefile
> @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING) += trace_events_filter.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENT) += trace_kprobe.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) += power-traces.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME),y)
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS) += rpm-traces.o
> +endif
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_TRACING),y)
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB_KDB) += trace_kdb.o
>  endif

Well, this still is kind of ugly.  I'd prefer my patch sent in this thread.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/