Re: Fw: [PATCH] sunrpc: use better NUMA affinities

[Greg Banks]

On 29/07/11 16:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 Ã 16:05 +1000, Greg Banks a Ãcrit :
> > On 29/07/11 15:32, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > I seem to remember coming to the conclusion that Jeff eventually
> > addressed this problem...am I misremembering or did something regress?
> Currently, all nfsd kthreads use memory for their kernel stack and
> various initial data from a _single_ node, even if you use
> sunrpc.pool_mode=pernode  (or percpu)

That's just plain broken and I'm very pleased to see you fix it.

I was just surprised that it was still broken and wondering how that 
happened.  Looking at ToT I see that because I dropped the ball in 2008, 
Jeff's patches didn't address the problem.  In ToT 
svc_pool_map_set_cpumask() is called *after* kthread_create() and 
applies to the child thread, *after* it's stack has been allocated on 
the wrong node.  In the working SGI code, svc_pool_map_set_cpumask() is 
called by the parent node on itself *before* calling kernel_thread() or 
doing any of the data structure allocations, thus ensuring that 
everything gets allocated using the default memory allocation policy, 
which on SGI NFS servers was globally tuned to be "node-local".

> With my patch, we make sure each thread gets its stack from its local
> node.
>
> Check commit 94dcf29a11b3d20a (kthread: use kthread_create_on_node()) to
> see how this strategy already was adopted for ksoftirqd, kworker,
> migration, and pktgend kthreads.

Ah, I see.  It's unfortunate that the kthread_create() API ends up being 
passed a CPU number but that's only used to format the name and not for 
sensible things :(

--
Greg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/