Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Jul 26 2011 - 22:23:17 EST


On 07/26/2011 06:47 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> 2011/7/27 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 05/18/2011 01:47 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> This is the draft plan for maintaining the ARM subarchitectures in a common
>>> tree, as a way to help coordinate the upstream merging of the
>>> arch/arm/{plat,mach}-* changes into Linus' tree.
>>>
>> [snip]
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 8fce5e6..942d052 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -630,6 +630,17 @@ S: Maintained
>>> F: drivers/amba/
>>> F: include/linux/amba/bus.h
>>>
>>> +ARM SUBARCHITECTURES
>>> +M: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>> +M: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +M: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +M: arm@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> +L: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>> +S: MAINTAINED
>>> +F: arch/arm/mach-*/
>>> +F: arch/arm/plat-*/
>>> +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-subarch.git
>>> +
>>> ARM/ADI ROADRUNNER MACHINE SUPPORT
>>> M: Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> L: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>>
>> Is this patch (or something similar) going to be merged now that the ARM
>> SoC tree is up and running? Also, is the arm@xxxxxxxxxx alias working?
> yes. arm soc tree has been working and 3.1 window has pulled from Arnd
> several times.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/arm/linux-arm-soc.git;a=summary
>

That didn't really answer my questions, but thanks for pointing to the
arm-soc tree.

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/