Re: [RFC] ARM Subarchitecture group maintainership

From: Barry Song
Date: Tue Jul 26 2011 - 21:48:03 EST


2011/7/27 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/18/2011 01:47 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> This is the draft plan for maintaining the ARM subarchitectures in a common
>> tree, as a way to help coordinate the upstream merging of the
>> arch/arm/{plat,mach}-* changes into Linus' tree.
>>
> [snip]
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 8fce5e6..942d052 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -630,6 +630,17 @@ S: Â Â Â Maintained
>> ÂF: Â drivers/amba/
>> ÂF: Â include/linux/amba/bus.h
>>
>> +ARM SUBARCHITECTURES
>> +M: Â Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> +M: Â Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> +M: Â Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> +M: Â arm@xxxxxxxxxx
>> +L: Â linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> +S: Â MAINTAINED
>> +F: Â arch/arm/mach-*/
>> +F: Â arch/arm/plat-*/
>> +T: Â git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-subarch.git
>> +
>> ÂARM/ADI ROADRUNNER MACHINE SUPPORT
>> ÂM: Â Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ÂL: Â linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers)
>>
>
> Is this patch (or something similar) going to be merged now that the ARM
> SoC tree is up and running? Also, is the arm@xxxxxxxxxx alias working?

yes. arm soc tree has been working and 3.1 window has pulled from Arnd
several times.

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/arm/linux-arm-soc.git;a=summary

>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/