Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Make hard lockup detection use timestamps

[Don Zickus]

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:11:13AM -0700, Alex Neronskiy wrote:
> The hard lockup detector is made to work more like the soft lockup
> detector by using timestamps to compare how long it's been since
> an event happened. Specifically, when the period function that checks
> for soft lockups fires, it touches a timestamp, and the hard lockup
> detector now checks if the timer is late, based on when it last fired.
> Hard stalls are now sub-hardlock threshold delays in the timer's
> firing which are nonetheless notable.

So I played with the hardlockup case and I kinda like the timestamp thing.
It seems to give useful data.  In fact I feel like I can shrink the
hardlockup window, run some tests and see where the latencies are in a
system.  The patch itself I think is ok, I'll review on Monday or Tuesday
when I get some more free time.

However, I ran the softlockup case and the output was a mess.  I think
rcu_sched stalls were being detected and as a result it was NMI dumping
stack traces for all cpus.  I can't tell if it was your patch or some
uncovered bug.

I'll dig into on Monday.  Not sure if you were able to see that.

Thanks,
Don

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Neronskiy <zakmagnus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/watchdog.c |   83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index bf26810..17bcded 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -40,30 +40,28 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, soft_watchdog_warn);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, hard_watchdog_warn);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, watchdog_nmi_touch);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts_saved);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts_missed);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_touch_ts);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event *, watchdog_ev);
>  
>  unsigned long worst_hardstall;
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hardstall_lock);
>  
> -/* The number of consecutive hard check failures before it's a lockup */
> -#define hardlockup_thresh (5)
> +/* How often to check for hard lockups compared to watchdog_thresh */
> +#define hardlockup_freq (5)
>  
> -/*
> - * The minimum expected number of missed interrupts in a normal hard
> - * lockup check.
> - */
> -#define hardstall_thresh (2)
> -
> -#endif /* CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR */
> +/* How late (in ms) a timer could be while still being ignored as "normal" */
> +#define hardstall_thresh (200)
>  
>  /*
>   * The number of milliseconds by which a stall must be worse than the
>   * current worst in order to be recorded. This prevents bursts of near-
>   * identical stalls.
>   */
> +#define hardstall_diff_thresh (100)
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR */
> +
> +/* Difference threshold for soft stalls (ms) */
>  #define softstall_diff_thresh (100)
>  
>  /* boot commands */
> @@ -156,6 +154,11 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
>  	return get_softlockup_thresh() * (NSEC_PER_SEC / 5);
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long get_sample_period_ms(void)
> +{
> +	return get_sample_period() >> 20LL;
> +}
> +
>  /* Commands for resetting the watchdog */
>  static void __touch_watchdog(void)
>  {
> @@ -211,11 +214,11 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
>  static void update_hardstall(unsigned long stall, int this_cpu)
>  {
>  	int update_stall = 0;
> -
> -	if (stall > hardstall_thresh && stall > worst_hardstall) {
> +	if (stall > hardstall_thresh &&
> +			stall > worst_hardstall + hardstall_diff_thresh) {
>  		unsigned long flags;
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&hardstall_lock, flags);
> -		update_stall = stall > worst_hardstall;
> +		update_stall = stall > worst_hardstall + hardstall_diff_thresh;
>  		if (update_stall)
>  			worst_hardstall = stall;
>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hardstall_lock, flags);
> @@ -223,7 +226,7 @@ static void update_hardstall(unsigned long stall, int this_cpu)
>  
>  	if (update_stall) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "LOCKUP may be in progress!"
> -			"Worst hard stall seen on CPU#%d: %lu interrupts missed\n",
> +			"Worst hard stall seen on CPU#%d: %lums\n",
>  			this_cpu, stall);
>  		dump_stack();
>  	}
> @@ -231,21 +234,27 @@ static void update_hardstall(unsigned long stall, int this_cpu)
>  
>  static int is_hardlockup(int this_cpu)
>  {
> -	unsigned long hrint = __this_cpu_read(hrtimer_interrupts);
> -	unsigned long hrint_saved = __this_cpu_read(hrtimer_interrupts_saved);
> -	unsigned long ints_missed = 0;
> +	unsigned long touch_ts = __this_cpu_read(hrtimer_touch_ts);
> +	unsigned long next_touch = touch_ts + get_sample_period_ms();
> +	unsigned long now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
> +	unsigned long delay = now - next_touch;
>  
> -	__this_cpu_write(hrtimer_interrupts_saved, hrint);
> +	/* the timer has never fired; no data to go on yet */
> +	if (unlikely(!touch_ts))
> +		return 0;
>  
> -	if (hrint_saved == hrint)
> -		ints_missed = per_cpu(hrtimer_interrupts_missed, this_cpu)++;
> -	else
> -		__this_cpu_write(hrtimer_interrupts_missed, 0);
> +	/*
> +	 * If the next touch is supposed to be in the future, then
> +	 * everything is fine. If it's not, that means it was missed
> +	 * and something's wrong.
> +	 */
> +	if (time_after(next_touch, now))
> +		return 0;
>  
> -	if (ints_missed >= hardlockup_thresh)
> +	if (delay >= (watchdog_thresh << 10L))
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	update_hardstall(ints_missed, this_cpu);
> +	update_hardstall(delay, this_cpu);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif
> @@ -311,10 +320,10 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* check for a hardlockup
> -	 * This is done by making sure our timer interrupt
> -	 * is incrementing.  The timer interrupt should have
> -	 * fired multiple times before we overflow'd.  If it hasn't
> -	 * then this is a good indication the cpu is stuck
> +	 * This is done by making sure our timer interrupts
> +	 * are firing. It is known approximately when the timer
> +	 * should fire and if it hasn't by then this is a good
> +	 * indication the cpu is stuck.
>  	 */
>  	lockup = is_hardlockup(this_cpu);
>  	if (lockup) {
> @@ -334,12 +343,12 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
>  	__this_cpu_write(hard_watchdog_warn, false);
>  	return;
>  }
> -static void watchdog_interrupt_count(void)
> +static void watchdog_interrupt_touch(int this_cpu)
>  {
> -	__this_cpu_inc(hrtimer_interrupts);
> +	__this_cpu_write(hrtimer_touch_ts, get_timestamp(this_cpu));
>  }
>  #else
> -static inline void watchdog_interrupt_count(void) { return; }
> +static inline void watchdog_interrupt_touch(int this_cpu) { return; }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR */
>  
>  /* watchdog kicker functions */
> @@ -350,15 +359,15 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
>  	int duration;
>  	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
> -	/* kick the hardlockup detector */
> -	watchdog_interrupt_count();
> -
>  	/* kick the softlockup detector */
>  	wake_up_process(__this_cpu_read(softlockup_watchdog));
>  
>  	/* .. and repeat */
>  	hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, ns_to_ktime(get_sample_period()));
>  
> +	/* kick the hardlockup detector now that the timer's been scheduled */
> +	watchdog_interrupt_touch(this_cpu);
> +
>  	if (touch_ts == 0) {
>  		if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(softlockup_touch_sync))) {
>  			/*
> @@ -460,7 +469,7 @@ static int watchdog_nmi_enable(int cpu)
>  	/* Try to register using hardware perf events */
>  	wd_attr = &wd_hw_attr;
>  	wd_attr->sample_period = hw_nmi_get_sample_period(watchdog_thresh);
> -	do_div(wd_attr->sample_period, hardlockup_thresh);
> +	do_div(wd_attr->sample_period, hardlockup_freq);
>  	event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(wd_attr, cpu, NULL, watchdog_overflow_callback);
>  	if (!IS_ERR(event)) {
>  		printk(KERN_INFO "NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.\n");
> -- 
> 1.7.3.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/