Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add context field to perf_event

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/12/2011 01:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >  Regarding LWP - I thought the intent was self-profiling by the process
> >  for jits and the like?  If you also use it for perf, won't it be
> >  unusable for that?  Also, can't the process interfere, from userspace,
> >  by executing the unprivileged LWP instructions?
>
> Ingo made perf-integration a merge-requirement for LWP. It is not really
> well-suited for being integrated into perf because the design goal was
> easy and efficient self-profiling of tasks (like you stated). So
> integrating it into perf causes some pain. But lets see how it works
> out.

I don't think it's workable.  Having do_mmap() called in the task's 
context can change how it works.  And the task being able to kill/modify 
the profile, and not able to use LWP for itself, is a show stopper IMO.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/