Re: [patch] perf_events: more wrong events for AMD fam10h

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 15:39 -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I'm in the process of auditing perf_event's awesome "generalized events".
> 
> On AMD fam10h for some we have the following definitions:
>   cache-references = INSTRUCTION_CACHE_FETCHES	0x530080
>   cache-misses 	   = INSTRUCTION_CACHE_MISSES	0x530081
> 
> on Intel at least I'm pretty sure these events match to Last Level Cache 
> accesses/misses, not icache.  Is there a reason for this?
> 
> Attached is a patch that removes these until better events can be found.
> (LLC is tricky on AMD as it's a shared resource).
> 
> Note, l1-dcache-stores is broken too, I'm looking into it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vince
> vweaver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> index fe29c1d..a46b987 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
> @@ -98,8 +98,6 @@ static const u64 amd_perfmon_event_map[] =
>  {
>    [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES]			= 0x0076,
>    [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS]			= 0x00c0,
> -  [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES]		= 0x0080,
> -  [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES]			= 0x0081,

Would 0x40000F7E0 and 0x40000F7E1 be better?

>    [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS]		= 0x00c2,
>    [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES]			= 0x00c3,
>    [PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND]	= 0x00d0, /* "Decoder empty" event */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/