Re: [PATCH 1/1] ptrace: make sure do_wait() won't hang afterPTRACE_ATTACH

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Feb 14 2011 - 13:09:20 EST


On 02/14, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 02/14, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On 02/13, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> $ strace -tt sleep 30
> >> >> 23:02:15.619262 execve("/bin/sleep", ["sleep", "30"], [/* 30 vars */]) = 0
> >> >> ...
> >> >> 23:02:15.622112 nanosleep({30, 0}, NULL) = ? ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK (To be restarted)
> >> >> 23:02:23.781165 --- SIGSTOP (Stopped (signal)) @ 0 (0) ---
> >> >> 23:02:23.781251 --- SIGSTOP (Stopped (signal)) @ 0 (0) ---
> >> >>     (I forgot again why we see it twice. Another quirk I guess...)
> >> >
> >> >      (this is correct, the tracee reports the signal=SIGSTOP, then
> >> >       it reports it actually stopps with exit_code=SIGSTOP)
> >>
> >> Ah, I see. Is there any way debugger can distinguish between these two
> >> different stops?
> >
> > IIRC, the (only?) way to distinguish is to check last_siginfo != NULL
> > via ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO).
>
> What do you think strace needs to do when it sees second SIGSTOP
> (meaning "in theory", not "on current kernel which may be buggy")?
>
> ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, $PID, 0x1, 0)?

proably this, or even ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, $PID, 0x1, SIGSTOP).
I think.

(assuming that ptrace_resume() respects TASK_STOPPED)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/