Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: Neaten %pK kptr_restrict, save a bit of codespace

From: Joe Perches
Date: Wed Jan 19 2011 - 18:11:15 EST


On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 14:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:21:12 -0800
> Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If kptr restrictions are on, just set the passed pointer to NULL.
> > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
[]
> > + if (!((kptr_restrict == 0) ||
> > + (kptr_restrict == 1 &&
> > + has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYSLOG))))
> > + ptr = NULL;
> > + break;
> This hurts my brain. Does it work?

Some say mentally challenging puzzles help deter/delay
onset of cognitive decline/Alzheimer's. See: www.dakim.com

A mentally less challenging perhaps cleaner form is:

if (kptr_restrict == 0)
break;
if (kptr_restrict == 1 &&
has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYSLOG))
break;
ptr = NULL;
break;

Your choice. ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/