Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] of: move phandle/ihandle into types.h andexport to userspace

[Grant Likely]

On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:45:57AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:36:50 -0600
> 
> > Weird.  Yeah, no other platforms expect to get a phandle type
> > definition from the kernel headers.  The only thing driving this
> > conversation is from arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild:
> > 
> > header-y += openprom.h
> 
> It was probably at one point for the sake of asm/openpromio.h but
> that header has no dependencies on openprom.h
> 
> The only hit I can find in google code search, for non-kernel code, is
> the SILO bootloader.
> 
> But that tree includes it's own copy of include/asm/openprom.h so
> the actual kernel copy isn't even used.
> 
> I'd say we can stop exporting that header and also therefore not
> worry about making phandle_t visible to userspace.

Yay!  That simplifies everything, and I believe it also means that the
phandle/ihandle definitions can remain where they currently are in
linux/of.h

Andres, can you post an updated series that includes removing
openprom.h from the header export list?

Thanks,
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/