Re: [PATCH 16/18] fs: Make iunique independent of inode_lock

From: Dave Chinner
Date: Fri Oct 08 2010 - 04:07:12 EST


On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:55:24AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + hlist_bl_for_each_entry(inode, node, &b->head, i_hash) {
> > + if (inode->i_ino == ino && inode->i_sb == sb) {
>
> wouldn't it be more natural to test the sb first here?

Maybe, but I think an inode number match is less likely, so the
order it currently does the check results in less code being
executed on misses. I'll have a look at the rest of the code and do
whatever order they do.

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/