Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: unnecesary double free in pcc_cpufreq_do_osc
From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Thu Sep 30 2010 - 15:59:58 EST
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> x86, cpufreq: avoid an unnecessary double free when finished in pcc_cpufreq_do_osc()
>
> There is no need to fall through the out_free label thus saving a kfree call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> index 994230d..db7dc35 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@ static int __init pcc_cpufreq_do_osc(acpi_handle *handle)
> if (!(supported & 0x1))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + return ret;
> +
> out_free:
> kfree(output.pointer);
> return ret;
Where is the double free here? I can't see it. I do see memory leaks
happening in error handling paths of pcc_cpufreq_do_osc() which makes
me think we need something like the attached patch.
Attachment:
0001-x86-cpufreq-Fix-pcc_cpufreq_do_osc-memory-leaks.patch
Description: Binary data