Re: [RFC 3/6] x86, NMI, Rename memory parity error to PCI SERRerror

[Huang Ying]

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:02 +0800, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 09.09.10 22:51:02, Huang Ying wrote:
> > memory parity error is only valid for IBM PC-AT, newer machine use 7
> > bit (0x80) of 0x61 port for PCI SERR. While memory error is usually
> > reported via MCE. So corresponding function name and kernel log string
> > is changed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h |    6 +++---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c           |   24 ++++++------------------
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h
> > @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
> >  
> >  #define NMI_REASON_PORT		0x61
> >  
> > -#define NMI_REASON_MEMPAR	0x80
> > +#define NMI_REASON_SERR		0x80
> >  #define NMI_REASON_IOCHK	0x40
> > -#define NMI_REASON_MASK		(NMI_REASON_MEMPAR | NMI_REASON_IOCHK)
> > +#define NMI_REASON_MASK		(NMI_REASON_SERR | NMI_REASON_IOCHK)
> >  
> > -#define NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MEMPAR	0x04
> > +#define NMI_REASON_CLEAR_SERR	0x04
> >  #define NMI_REASON_CLEAR_IOCHK	0x08
> >  #define NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MASK	0x0f
> 
> Haven't you introduced *_MEMPAR with patch 1/6?

Yes. And I suggest to rename it to *_SERR in this patch to reflect the
contemporary hardware better. I think they are two steps: naming the
magic number and changing the name of constant and function.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/