Re: [linux-pm] Notes from the Boston Linux Power ManagementMini-summit - August 9th, 2010

[Mark Brown]

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> A gap:
> 
> On OMAP, bus control is independent of CPU frequency control,
> so cpufreq and cpuidle don't quite fit the bill.
> 
> Perhaps a "bus-idle" analogous to "cpu-idle" may be appropriate?

FWIW this applies to a bunch of other embedded processors too - OMAP
isn't particularly unique here, though it's one of the furthest along in
terms of exploting this in mainline Linux.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/