Re: [PATCH 12/12] vmscan: Do not writeback pages in direct reclaim

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Tue Jun 15 2010 - 21:45:18 EST


On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:53:43 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06/15/2010 08:39 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > Hmm, or do you recommend no-dirty-page-writeback when a memcg hits limit ?
> > Maybe we'll see much swaps.
> >
> > I want to go with this for a while, changing memcg's behavior will took
> > some amounts of time, there are only a few developpers.
>
> One thing we can do, for kswapd, memcg and direct reclaim alike,
> is to tell the flusher threads to flush pages related to a pageout
> candidate page to disk.
>
> That way the reclaiming processes can wait on some disk IO to
> finish, while the flusher thread takes care of the actual flushing.
>
> That should also fix the "kswapd filesystem IO has really poor IO
> patterns" issue.
>
> There's no reason not to fix this issue the right way.
>
yes. but this patch just stops writeback. I think it's sane to ask
not to change behavior until there are some useful changes in flusher
threads.

IMO, until flusher threads can work with I/O cgroup, memcg shoudln't
depend on it because writeback allows stealing resource without it.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/