Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: concurrency managed workqueue, take#5

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon Jun 14 2010 - 18:53:58 EST

On 06/15/2010 12:49 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 00:44 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On 06/15/2010 12:35 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>>> What is you definition of "concurrency" ? and explain try to explain it
>>> in terms of your patchset.
>> How many workers are concurrently executing? What else? Eh... I'll
>> write up another summary tomorrow. Let's talk it there.
> I'd suggest If you write up another description try to not use the word
> concurrency .. That term can be used for all sorts of things, and it
> doesn't covey enough detail for anyone to know what your implementation
> is actually doing.

So is "manage" and "level of concurrency" is often used to describe
exactly this type of property. I'll try to be clear.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at