Re: Noticeable slow-down in 2.6.35-rc3

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Mon Jun 14 2010 - 12:27:50 EST

On Monday 14 June 2010, walt wrote:
>On 06/13/2010 03:13 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this patch will not apply to my src tree for 2.6.35-rc3,
>> even after I fixed the unwanted line wrap in the first active line.
>> I get:
>> [root@coyote linux-2.6.35-rc3]# patch -p1<../2.6.35-rc3-test.patch
>> patching file net/core/skbuff.c
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 532.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/core/skbuff.c.rej
>> Did my grabbing it with swiftfox damage it even further?
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> index 9f07e74..bcf2fa3 100644
>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> @@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ static void __copy_skb_header(struct sk_buff *new,
>> const struct sk_buff *old) new-&gt;ip_summed = old-&gt;ip_summed;

It also seems that the whole string "&gt;ip_" has been traded for the
leading c in the var names. So that patch was totally trashed by a broken
html converter by the time it actually got to my machine.

Where can I get a pristine copy?

I am also wondering if this has anything to do with my missing USB devices
when booted to 2.6.35-rc3. In my case the symptoms are as it it did not
recurse far enough up the various branches of my usb tree from hell to find


Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

Dear Prince:

Use ladder tonight -- you're splitting my ends.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at