Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Jun 11 2010 - 16:00:18 EST

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The others all fix oopsen or big problems, and I think fixing warnings
> helps avoid false negatives as others look for real problems?
> I'm happy to rebase out the 3 non-criticals.

There seems to be more than three non-criticals. There's the warning
fixes, the "unused variables" thing, the "memdup_user()" thing, a
couple of unnecessary NULL checks removed etc. On the whole, I do not
get the feeling that the pull request was actively trying to be
minimal, and that's what I really want to see.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at