Re: [PATCH] online CPU before memory failed in pcpu_alloc_pages()

[minskey guo]

On 05/21/2010 04:39 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:19 +0800
> minskey guo<chaohong_guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
> > Yes.  I can use cpu_to_mem().  only some little difference during
> > CPU online:  1st cpu within memoryless node gets memory from current
> > node or the node to which the cpu0 belongs,
> >
> >
> > But I have a question about the patch:
> >
> >      numa-slab-use-numa_mem_id-for-slab-local-memory-node.patch,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > @@ -2968,9 +2991,23 @@ static int __build_all_zonelists(void *d
> > ...
> >
> > -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > 		setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu), 0);
> > ...
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
> > + 	if (cpu_online(cpu))
> > +		cpu_to_mem(cpu) = local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
> > +#endif

Look at the above code,  int __build_all_zonelists(),  cpu_to_mem(cpu)
is set only when cpu is onlined.  Suppose that a node with local memory,
all memory segments are onlined first, and then,  cpus within that node
are onlined one by one,  in this case,  where does the cpu_to_mem(cpu)
for the last cpu get its value ?


> So, cpu_to_node(cpu) for possible cpus will have NUMA_NO_NODE(-1)
> or the number of the nearest node.
>
> IIUC, if SRAT is not broken, all pxm has its own node_id.

Thank you very much for the info,  I have been thinking why node_id
is (-1) in some cases.


-minskey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/