Re: [PATCH 2/2]: atomic_t: Remove volatile from atomic_tdefinition

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon May 17 2010 - 11:04:57 EST

On Mon, 17 May 2010, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> It turns out this bad code is a result of us defining atomic_t as a
> volatile int.

Heh. Ok, as you point out in the commit message, I obviously agree with
this patch. "volatile" on data is evil, with the possible exception of
"jiffies" type things.

So applied.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at