Re: [PATCH 07/11] Memory compaction core

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Mar 24 2010 - 17:15:31 EST


On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:59:46 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:33:47 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > + VM_BUG_ON(cc == NULL);
> >
> > It's a bit strange to test this when we're about to oops anyway. The
> > oops will tell us the same thing.
>
> ...except that we've seen a fair number of null pointer dereference
> exploits that have told us something altogether different. Are we
> *sure* we don't want to test for null pointers...?
>

It's hard to see what the test gains us really - the kernel has
zillions of pointer derefs, any of which could be NULL if we have a
bug. Are we more likely to have a bug here than elsewhere?

This one will oops on a plain old read, so it's a bit moot in this
case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/