Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c
From: Neil Brown
Date: Wed Mar 24 2010 - 05:50:37 EST
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:20:11 +0000
Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:12:23PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > Two patches.
> >
> > The second removes S_BIAS which is unnecessary and so potentially
> > confusing.
> >
> > The first I found the need for while preparing the second patch. It
> > seems that get_active_super doesn't follow the pattern of all other
> > code that walks the super_blocks list.
>
> See #untested in vfs tree...
>
Ahhh, I see I've been beaten to it by 2 days... I should have posted that
patch months ago :-)
Thanks anyway.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/