Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c

[Al Viro]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:12:23PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> Two patches.
> 
>  The second removes S_BIAS which is unnecessary and so potentially
>  confusing.
> 
>  The first I found the need for while preparing the second patch.  It
>  seems that get_active_super doesn't follow the pattern of all other
>  code that walks the super_blocks list.

See #untested in vfs tree...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/