Re: Improving OOM killer

[Lubos Lunak]

On Wednesday 10 of February 2010, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 03:54 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> >   Which however can mean that not killing this system daemon will be
> > traded for DoS-ing the whole system, if the daemon keeps spawning new
> > children as soon as the OOM killer frees up resources for them.
>
> Killing the system daemon *is* a DoS.

 Maybe, but if there are two such system daemons on the machine, it's only 
half of the other DoS. And since that system daemon has already been 
identified as a forkbomb, it's probably already useless anyway and killing 
the children won't save anything. In which realistic case a system daemon has 
children that together cause OOM, yet can still be considered working after 
you kill one or a limited number of those children?

> It would stop eg. the database or the web server, which is
> generally the main task of systems that run a database or
> a web server.

-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 openSUSE Boosters team, KDE developer
 l.lunak@xxxxxxx , l.lunak@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/