Re: [PATCH] libsrp: fix compile failure

[James Bottomley]

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 20:24 +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> Am Montag, den 04.01.2010, 17:35 +0000 schrieb Alan Cox:
> > > least once before it goes to Linus.  There were originally technical
> > > reasons why -mm wasn't in ... I just thought they'd been fixed by now.
> > 
> > No - mm also caused problems with the kfifo merge of a core API change
> > that didn't go via -next.
> > 
> > Alan
> 
> I tried my best to port everything to the new kfifo API. But it was not
> possible to check it against every architecture.

That's what linux-next is for:  to make at least this compile checking
against all of our architectures more of a reality.  It's still missing
bits, and some of the ports (*cough* parisc *cough*) compile against
linux-next rather infrequently, but it's far better than nothing.

>  x86 and x86_64 was
> compile clean. I think the missing #include was not a big thing.

It's easily fixable, yes ... breaking the build *is* a pretty big thing
because of the fallout it causes (for ppc: about ~100 instant WTF
moments followed by grubbing around in git to find the cause).

It's also an indicator of future problems.  Realistically, all API
changes should go into linux-next both to prevent this sort of thing
from happening and to see if we have any other pending conflicts that
may cause problems.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/