Re: [PATCH] can: CAN_MCP251X should depend on HAS_DMA

From: Wolfgang Grandegger
Date: Sun Dec 13 2009 - 15:48:07 EST


Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When building for Sun 3:
>
> drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c:1074: undefined reference to `dma_free_coherent'
> drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c:976: undefined reference to `dma_alloc_coherent'
> drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c:1050: undefined reference to `dma_free_coherent'
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> index 8c485aa..05b7517 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ config CAN_TI_HECC
>
> config CAN_MCP251X
> tristate "Microchip MCP251x SPI CAN controllers"
> - depends on CAN_DEV && SPI
> + depends on CAN_DEV && SPI && HAS_DMA
> ---help---
> Driver for the Microchip MCP251x SPI CAN controllers.
>

DMA can be selected with the module parameter "mcp251x_enable_dma" and
is *off* by default. Therefore the driver does in principle not depend
on HAS_DMA but I'm not sure if it's worth to handle it with #idef's.
Christian? Any thought?

Wolfgang.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/