Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] copy_signal cleanup: clean tty_audit_fork()

[Miloslav Trmac]

----- "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/04, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_audit.c b/drivers/char/tty_audit.c
> > index ac16fbe..283a15b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tty_audit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tty_audit.c
> > @@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ void tty_audit_fork(struct signal_struct *sig)
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> >  	sig->audit_tty = current->signal->audit_tty;
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> > -	sig->tty_audit_buf = NULL;
> >  }
> 
> Off-topic question to this who understands this code.
> 
> But afaics we can also remove ->siglock from this helper and make
> it really trivial for being inline. ->siglock buys nothing, we just
> read a boolean. In fact, after the quick grep I do not understand
> how ->siglock is connected to ->audit_tty. OK, it protects
> tty_audit_buf,
> but why we always take ->siglock to access ->audit_tty ?
AFAIK there is no explicit documentation of the atomicity semantics expected by the Linux kernel (both from the hardware and from the compiler), so every access to the boolean is protected by a lock, to be on the safe side.
    Mirek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/