Re: [PATCH v3] vfs: new O_NODE open flag

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Sat Dec 05 2009 - 14:41:01 EST


On Sat, 05 Dec 2009, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I don't know what that means. Do you mean that if:
>
> root creates /dev/foo with 0666 perms
> eviluser opens /dev/foo with O_NODE

More precisely, O_NODE | O_NOACCESS

> root chmods /dev/foo to 0000
> root unlinks /dev/foo
>
> then eviluser can't open /proc/self/fd/whatever for O_RDRW

Yes.

Maybe alan was worried about the O_NODE | O_RDWR, etc. case? That
simply doesn't make any sense for special files.

Current patch only allows O_NOACCESS for any file type, but other
access modes may make sense for regular files, directories, and maybe
even symlinks.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/