Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Thursday 03 December 2009 11:30:50 pm Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 12/03/2009 05:23 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 December 2009 11:10:51 pm Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Is it good kernel practice to intermingle cosmetic changes with
> >> functional ones, in the same code lines?  Also, no.
> >
> > I prefer using common sense over black-and-white rules.
> >
> > If patch is a _really_ tiny one (<  20 LOC changed) it sometimes makes
> > sense to save the time on handling separate patches.
> 
> This is open source -- you have to consider the time saved by reviewers too.

Like I said previously this is best done on per-case basis and because it is
open source eventually people will come up with an alternative patch if they
find the current one too bothersome to review, merge etc.

> But I doubt you have saved time on all your motivated commit searches, so...

Well, just two basic searches limited to one contributor and one directory..

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/