Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: setting mmaped page cache property through device tree

From: Segher Boessenkool
Date: Wed Dec 02 2009 - 23:08:46 EST


The scenario for the first case is that in a multicore system running
ASMP which means different OS runs on different cores. They might
communicate through a shared memory region. The region on every OS
need to be mapped with the same cache perperty to avoid cache paradox.

This isn't true. In ASMP, you cannot usually do coherency between
the different CPUs at all. Also, in most PowerPC implementations,

Coherency can't be achieved with proper configuration and management? Why so?

Because different CPUs do not usually speak the same coherency protocol.

However, it occurred to me that what you call ASMP is actually SMP where
you run different OSes on the various cores?

it is fine if one CPU maps a memory range as coherent while another
maps it as non-coherent; sure, you have to be careful or you will

But we do want the shared region to be coherent. So mappings should
have the same cacheability property.

No, they only need WIMG=xx1x on both sides. Of course, IM=11 might not
be a valid combination on your particular CPU, and it probably is better
for performance to have the RAM cacheable anyway.

So make the memory known to the kernel, just tell the kernel not to
use it. If it's normal system RAM, just put it in the "memory" node
and do a memreserve on it (or do something in your platform code); if
it's some other memory, do a device driver for it, map it there.

Your solution is feasible. But the memory allocation is a software
configuration. IMHO, it should be better and easier addressed by
changing configurations(like mem parameter) rather than the kernel
platform code which should address hardware configuration.

Either platform code or some other boot-time code, sure.

The point is, you put the RAM in the device tree, so the kernel can
know that particular range of physical address space is RAM, even
if it doesn't use it itself.


Segher

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/