Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: setting mmaped page cache property through device tree

[Li Yang]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Segher Boessenkool
<segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The scenario for the first case is that in a multicore system running
>> ASMP which means different OS runs on different cores. ÂThey might
>> communicate through a shared memory region. ÂThe region on every OS
>> need to be mapped with the same cache perperty to avoid cache paradox.
>
> This isn't true. ÂIn ASMP, you cannot usually do coherency between
> the different CPUs at all. ÂAlso, in most PowerPC implementations,

Coherency can't be achieved with proper configuration and management?  Why so?

> it is fine if one CPU maps a memory range as coherent while another
> maps it as non-coherent; sure, you have to be careful or you will

But we do want the shared region to be coherent.  So mappings should
have the same cacheability property.

> read stale data, but things won't wedge.
>
>> The scenario for the second case is to pre-allocate some memory to a
>> certain application or device (probably through mem=XXX kernel
>> parameter or limit through device tree). ÂThe memory is not known to
>> kernel, but fully managed by the application/device. ÂWe need being
>> able to map the region cachable for better performance.
>
> So make the memory known to the kernel, just tell the kernel not to
> use it. ÂIf it's normal system RAM, just put it in the "memory" node
> and do a memreserve on it (or do something in your platform code); if
> it's some other memory, do a device driver for it, map it there.

Your solution is feasible.  But the memory allocation is a software
configuration.  IMHO, it should be better and easier addressed by
changing configurations(like mem parameter) rather than the kernel
platform code which should address hardware configuration.

- Leo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/