Re: linux-next: nfs/nfsd trees fetch failed

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu Nov 26 2009 - 17:59:40 EST

Next message: Trent Piepho: "Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was:Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure"
Previous message: Buck: "Re: observe and act upon workload parallelism: PERF_TYPE_PARALLELISM (Was: [RFC][PATCH] sched_wait_block: wait for blocked threads)"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: linux-next: nfs/nfsd trees fetch failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Trond,

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:30:22 -0500 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm aware of the problem, and I'm sorry. I'm hoping that I can
> get Linux-nfs.org up and running again tomorrow (== Saturday your
> time) after the Thanksgiving celebrations.

OK, thanks, no hurry.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Trent Piepho: "Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was:Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure"
Previous message: Buck: "Re: observe and act upon workload parallelism: PERF_TYPE_PARALLELISM (Was: [RFC][PATCH] sched_wait_block: wait for blocked threads)"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: linux-next: nfs/nfsd trees fetch failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]