Re: tps65010: Allow the board to choose any GPIO base.

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Ben,

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:52:20PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> If the board does not care where the TPS turns up, then specifiying the
> value -1 to get gpiolib to dynamically allocate the base for the chip
> is valid.
> 
> Change the test to look for != 0, so that any boards specifying zero
> will not end up with gpio that they didn't want.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Simtec Liunx Team <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied, thanks a lot.


> ---
>  drivers/mfd/tps65010.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c	2009-10-21 19:09:28.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65010.c	2009-10-21 19:09:39.000000000 +0100
> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static int tps65010_probe(struct i2c_cli
>  				tps, DEBUG_FOPS);
>  
>  	/* optionally register GPIOs */
> -	if (board && board->base > 0) {
> +	if (board && board->base != 0) {
>  		tps->outmask = board->outmask;
>  
>  		tps->chip.label = client->name;
> 
> -- 
> Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/)
> 
>   'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/