Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28

[Johannes Berg]

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 10:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> So i have read the thread you and Bartlomiej referenced:
> 
>     http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/17/81
> 
> ... and my understanding of that discussion is very different from 
> yours. Here is my annotated history of the beginnings of that 
> discussion:

[snip]

You shouldn't ignore all previous interaction between Bart and us --
which wasn't pretty: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/901892

Of course we were biased when he came around with that petty code
duplication argument, since it seemed to support only his agenda of
working only with the staging drivers.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part