Re: Help needed, Re: [Bug #14334] pcmcia suspend regression from 2.6.31.1 to 2.6.31.2 - Dell Inspiron 600m

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 31 October 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > The patch is appended, please have a look.
> 
> Looks sane to me. It does the actual real socket ops early, and does the 
> crazy pcmcia resume late. 
> 
> And I like how you abstracted out that dev->socket thing in 
> pcmcia_socket_dev_run().
> 
> The only thing that looks odd is how you do "socket_start_resume()" in the 
> "late_resume" path too - that has already been done by the early_resume, 
> and as far as I can see you're now initializing the socket twice.
> 
> Is there a reason for that? Or am I misreading the patch (I didn't 
> actually apply it, I just read the patch itself).

Yes, there is, because socket_early_resume() only does it in
the (skt->state & SOCKET_PRESENT) case.  If that bit is not set, the
initialization is entirely postponed.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/