Re: [RFC] Remove or convert empty ioctls ?

[Jeff Garzik]

On 10/15/2009 11:49 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> There are cases where
>
> 	case IOCWIBBLE:
> 		return -EINVAL;
>
> is correct but they are unusual - basically the case where the driver
> author wants to "support" the ioctl but there is no argument that it can
> be given which is correct.

This is the type of case I was referring to.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/