Re: [PATCH v4] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs

[Mike Frysinger]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 16:53, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 15:48, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 23:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
>> >> index fd9a3e6..95a39fb 100644
>> >> --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
>> >> +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt
>> >> @@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ disabled, and more (ftrace allows for tracer plugins, which
>> >> Âmeans that the list of tracers can always grow).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> +Implementation Details
>> >> +----------------------
>> >> +
>> >> +See ftrace-implementation.txt for details for arch porters and such.
>> >
>> > Might want to specify that this is for the function tracer.
>>
>> well, all of ftrace.txt says "function tracer", so if/when someone
>> cleans that up, this will get fixed in the process.
>
> Well things do need to be clean up, the original code had the function
> tracer called ftrace, which it no longer does. Why add more incorrect
> documentation just to match the previous incorrect documentation?

if the filename is updated, do i really need to duplicate it ?

See function-tracer-design.txt for details for arch porters and such.

if people add other design/porting info, this can be a simple list and
the filename itself can imply the details contained within ...
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/