Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf_counter: Add open/close pmu callbacks

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:22:02PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker writes:
> 
> > Add the open() and close() callback to the pmu structure.
> > Open is called when a counter is initialized just after it's allocation
> > and close is called when the counter is about to be released.
> > 
> > These callbacks are useful for example when a pmu has to deal with
> > several registers and needs to maintain an internal list of counters
> > using them. Given such list, the pmu is able to check if the the number
> > of physical registers are still sufficient for the new created counter
> > and then accept or refuse this counter.
> 
> We already do that sort of thing on powerpc for hardware counters.
> 
> It looks to me that you can easily do that stuff in the appropriate
> xxx_perf_counter_init function, since pmu->open() is only called
> immediately on return from one the various xxx_perf_counter_init
> functions, and xxx_perf_counter_init is what says what pmu struct to
> use.
> 
> As for ->close(), that's what counter->destroy is there for.  On
> powerpc, hw_perf_counter_init sets counter->destroy to an appropriate
> destructor function, as does tp_perf_counter_init.  So if you need a
> destructor for breakpoint counters, just make bp_perf_counter_init set
> counter->destroy appropriately.
> 
> Paul.


Right. pmu->open/close is basically a mirror of *_perf_counter_init()
and counter->destroy() but in the pmu layer.

As you prefer I can indeed remove that, the end-result looks a bit
confusing to me too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/