Epic regression in throughput since v2.6.23

[Serge Belyshev]

Hi. I've done measurments of time taken by make -j4 kernel build
on a quadcore box.  Results are interesting: mainline kernel
has regressed since v2.6.23 release by more than 10%.

The following graph is time taken by "make -j4" (median over 9 runs)
versus kernel version.  The huge (10%) regressions since v2.6.23 is
apparent.  Note that tip/master c26f010 is better than current mainline.
Also note that BFS is significantly better than both and shows the same
throughput as vanilla v2.6.23:

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7029/epicmakej4.png


The following plot is a detailed comparison of time taken versus number
of parallel jobs. Note that at "make -j4" (which equals number of hardware
threads), BFS has the minimum (best performance), 
and tip/master -- maximum (worst).  I've also tested mainline v2.6.31
(not shown on the graph) which produces similar, albeit a bit slower,
results as the tip/master.

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/5335/epicbfstip.png


Conclusion are
1) mainline has severely regressed since v2.6.23
2) BFS shows optimal performance at make -jN where N equals number of
   h/w threads, while current mainline scheduler performance is far from
   optimal in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/