Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity ofread_persistent_clock()

From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Tue Aug 25 2009 - 20:27:02 EST

Ingo Molnar writes:

> So i think this is much ado about nothing. Testing was done, the fix
> was applied immediately and no kitten was hurt in the process.

I agree.

I have a question though: I notice that you add cc's to patches that
get committed to the tip tree. Do you do that manually, or is it

And I have a request: when a patch touches architecture-specific code,
could you add a cc to the maintainer of that architecture?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at