RE: [PATCH 04/11] Blackfin SPORT UART: fix overrun errors

From: Cai, Cliff
Date: Wed Jun 03 2009 - 04:46:23 EST




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 4:04 PM
>To: Alan Cox
>Cc: Mike Frysinger; linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>uclinux-dist-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cai, Cliff; Bryan Wu
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] Blackfin SPORT UART: fix overrun errors
>
>On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 05:00, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Tue,  2 Jun 2009 03:11:33 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> From: Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Push the ty_flip_buffer_push() call from the IRQ handler to a timer
>>> so as to improve performance and decrease likelihood of overruns.
>>
>> This should have no effect on a modern kernel.
>
>well, we wouldnt be making changes if we werent seeing data
>overruns today
>
>> There is 64K of queueing between you and the ldisc nowdays.
>
>i dont think that really matters ... we do too much work in
>the interrupt and so we miss new data
>
>> Furthermore unless you set tty->low_latency the kernel already
>> basically does this aggregation for you as the buffer push queues
>> stuff for the ldisc to wake up and process.
>
>i guess we could try setting the low_latency bool instead and
>see if that fixes things -mike
>

The overrrun problem doesn't exist even without my patch now,so I will drop it.

Thanks

Cliff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/