[PATCH 03/19] trace_workqueue: remove cpu_workqueue_stats->first_entry

[Frederic Weisbecker]

From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

cpu_workqueue_stats->first_entry is useless because we can retrieve the
header of a cpu workqueue using:
if (&cpu_workqueue_stats->list == workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list.next)

[ Impact: cleanup ]

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
index 128b64b..890974a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
 /* A cpu workqueue thread */
 struct cpu_workqueue_stats {
 	struct list_head            list;
-/* Useful to know if we print the cpu headers */
-	bool		            first_entry;
 	int		            cpu;
 	pid_t			    pid;
 /* Can be inserted from interrupt or user context, need to be atomic */
@@ -103,8 +101,6 @@ static void probe_workqueue_creation(struct task_struct *wq_thread, int cpu)
 	cws->pid = wq_thread->pid;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
-	if (list_empty(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list))
-		cws->first_entry = true;
 	list_add_tail(&cws->list, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
 }
-- 
1.6.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/