[PATCH 02/19] trace_workqueue: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each_entry_safe()

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Wed Apr 29 2009 - 20:28:22 EST


From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

No need to use list_for_each_entry_safe() in iteration without deleting
any node, we can use list_for_each_entry() instead.

[ Impact: cleanup ]

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 10 ++++------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
index cfe56d3..128b64b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
@@ -47,12 +47,11 @@ probe_workqueue_insertion(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
- struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
+ struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
unsigned long flags;

spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
- list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(node, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list, list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
atomic_inc(&node->inserted);
goto found;
@@ -69,12 +68,11 @@ probe_workqueue_execution(struct task_struct *wq_thread,
struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
- struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node, *next;
+ struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
unsigned long flags;

spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(node, next, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list,
- list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(node, &workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->list, list) {
if (node->pid == wq_thread->pid) {
node->executed++;
goto found;
--
1.6.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/