Re: [PATCH] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:22:50AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> lockd/svclock.c is missing a header file <linux/fs.h>.
> 
> <linux/fs.h> is missing a definition of locks_release_private()
> for the config case of FILE_LOCKING=n, causing a build error:
> 
> fs/lockd/svclock.c:330: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_release_private'

LOCKD without FILE_LOCKING doesn't really make sense; would it be better
to add a config dependency?

--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/lockd/svclock.c |    1 +
>  include/linux/fs.h |    4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> +++ linux-next-20090428/fs/lockd/svclock.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
> --- linux-next-20090428.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux-next-20090428/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1183,6 +1183,10 @@ static inline void locks_remove_flock(st
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  static inline void posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
>  {
>  	return;
> 
> -- 
> ~Randy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/